Static & reverse-engineering analysis
Binary review for embedded secrets, weak crypto, and logic an attacker can lift — what your app reveals to anyone with a decompiler.
Cybersecurity · Security Testing
Your app runs on hardware you don't control
Every install hands your binary, your keys, and your API surface to a device an attacker can own completely. Mobile security testing assesses what that access yields: reversible secrets, insecure storage, weak transport, and backend trust that assumes the app is honest.
Independent quality engineering & cybersecurity since 2020 — 100+ security & quality engineers, delivering on platforms we build and run ourselves.
A shipped mobile flaw can't be quietly patched — it lives on user devices through every slow update cycle, and hardcoded credentials in an APK are public the day someone looks.
What we do
Runtime testing
Instrumented-device assessment: storage, keychain/keystore use, IPC exposure, and jailbreak/root behavior.
Transport & API trust
TLS configuration, pinning, and the backend's assumptions when the client is hostile — usually the highest-impact findings.
Platform-permission review
Permission scope, exported components, and data flows against platform security models.
How it’s delivered
01
Scope
Platforms, builds, and backend boundaries.
02
Assess
Static, dynamic, and API testing aligned to OWASP MASVS.
03
Report
Findings with device-level reproduction.
04
Retest
Fix verification on updated builds.
Tools & standards
- Methodology
- OWASP MASVS/MASTG
- Tooling
- Burp Suite Pro, instrumentation frameworks, platform analysis tooling
What you receive
- MASVS-mapped findings for iOS and Android
- Reverse-engineering exposure summary
- Backend trust-boundary findings with API repro
- Retest verification on fixed builds
Engagement
Ways to engage the same senior bench
Buy it as a scoped project, embed it in your team, or run it as a managed service — same engineers, same governance, whichever shape fits.
Point-in-time assessment
A scoped, one-time assessment with a full report and one retest — for a release gate, a customer or audit requirement, or an annual baseline.
Standing program
Recurring assessment cycles aligned to your release cadence, with retesting each cycle so the evidence stays current across surveillance audits.
On-demand scope additions
Add an application, API, or environment to an existing program without re-contracting — scoped and started in days, not procurement cycles.
Who this is for
- Fintech, health, and consumer apps holding regulated data on-device
- Teams that pentest their web app yearly and their mobile app never
- Products shipping SDKs or white-label apps under partner brands
Common questions
iOS, Android, or both?
Both, assessed against the OWASP MASVS/MASTG — static and reverse-engineering analysis, instrumented runtime testing, and the backend trust assumptions that are usually the highest-impact findings.
Why does mobile need separate testing from our web pentest?
Your app ships to a device an attacker fully controls. Reversible secrets, insecure storage, and weak transport are mobile-specific risks a web pentest never touches — and a shipped flaw can't be quietly patched.
Is retesting included?
Yes. Remediation of reported findings is verified and the report updated to 'remediated and retested' — the wording auditors expect. Retest scope and window are set in the engagement agreement.
One practice, not one vendor
This is one stage of a single assurance loop: findings become regression tests, and their indicators become live detections — so a problem, once fixed, can’t quietly come back. That’s what you get from one integrated partner that a stack of separate vendors can’t. See how the loop connects →
Ready to scope the work?
A 30-minute call with the engineers who will do the testing — not a sales gate.